WHEN WILL SUDDEN ADULT DEATH (SAD) FROM STROKE OR HEART ISSUES BE CONSIDERED VACCINE DEATHS?

WHEN WILL SUDDEN ADULT DEATH (SAD) FROM STROKE OR HEART ISSUES BE CONSIDERED VACCINE DEATHS?
The TRUTH about COVID vaccines told by those who forced the masses to take them. "I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection."

I firmly believe that there is going to be a reckoning of sorts regarding this new phenomena called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) but it is not going to be spearheaded by the liberal left or the mainstream media, but from grieving loved ones that will begin to make the connection between the sudden death of their healthy relative, friend or co-worker and the fact that they have been vaccinated and boosted with the experimental MRNA shot.

So, let's go back a couple of years and listen to the 2 champions of the U.S. COVID Task Team, Dr. Deborah Birx and Tony Fauci.  I want you to REALLY pay attention to what they say; turn your captions on.  

Let's just break this down.  Dr. Birx is asked by a liberal reporter (who pushes back a little bit) if the COVID death numbers are being "misreported."  Here is Dr. Birx, nutshell response;

"There are other countries that if you had a preexisting condition and let's say the virus caused you to go to the ICU and then have a heart or kidney problem some countries are recording as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death. Right now we are still recording it and we will I mean the great thing about having forms that come in and a form that has the ability to market as COVID-19 infection the intent is right now that those if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that as a COVID-19 death."

What Dr. Birx is clearly stating here, is that if you have a comorbidity, like a heart or kidney condition and you went to the hospital because of COVID symptoms and died, it doesn't matter what you died from if you tested positive for COVID.  Now, I have written about this before, but as I write this now, 2 important factors come to mind.  The first is that the EUA drug used was Remdesivir, which had a toxic history of causing kidney and other organ failure, some leading to death and then the common use of ventilators on ICU admitted COVID patients, which was later discovered to cause death in COVID patients.  I digress, but these are extremely important facts with consequences we, as the general public, didn't know back then but do know now.

Back to the video; the reporter shockingly pushed back just a tiny bit and asks Dr. Birx, "Can you be sure?  I mean you hear from coroners that that's not necessarily the case...skews the data..."    Oh, hard question! Good job reporter!   Bring in Master Fauci to make the lie and the BLATANT SKEWING of the actual cause of death sound plausible. "I can't imagine if someone comes in with Coronavirus, goes to an ICU and they have an underlying heart condition and they die, they're gonna say 'Cause of death: heart attack' (chuckle) I can not see that happening.  So I don't think that is going to be a problem." 

What's not going to be a "problem" Dr. Fauci?  Lying, faking the data, instructing hospitals and coroner's to state a heart attack as a COVID death?  A car accident as a COVID death?  A suicide as a COVID death?  A terminally ill cancer patient as a COVID death?  A ventilator or remdesivir death as a COVID death?  Just listening to his arrogance in his response..."no one is going to question me!"  

Many coroner's, not just in the US, but around the world were claiming that COVID was NOT the cause of death but they were being instructed to state it was! $$$  Here is an interesting article at the beginning of the virus that contains a lot of double speak but if you understand how read through it you will understand...and here is one with a slightly different slant on the skewed numbers.

Now, this brings me to the real reason I am writing this.  So, if Dr. Birx can say, "we've taken a very liberal approach to morality"  in regards to people being listed as a COVID death, like, if you died while testing + for it, well then you DIED OF IT, then can the same ideology be used for all the vaccinated people who are dropping dead...SUDDENLY?  

Seriously, we all know there is a connection between SADS and the vaccine, some just don't want to admit it.  If the same "liberal approach" can be used to claim that more than 1 million people have died of COVID, than shouldn't that same liberal logic be applied to people who have died WITH the vaccine?  Especially those who are young, healthy, with NO comorbidities but simply dropped dead of a sudden stroke or unexpected heart condition?  This makes perfect sense to me, not liberal political science sense, but actual academic SCIENCE sense! 

Facebook Comments Box

Daniella Cross

Daniella Cross is a writer who seeks out the truth that the mainstream media ignores, evades, or otherwise conceals from the public.
Close Menu
×
×

Cart